Do You Think That Data Mining Is Also The Result Of The Evolution Of Machine Learning Research?

Systematic approach to agreement the beliefs of humans and other animals

Behaviorism is a systematic approach to understanding the behavior of humans and other animals.^[i] It assumes that behavior is either a reflex evoked by the pairing of certain ancestor stimuli in the environment, or a outcome of that private'due south history, including particularly reinforcement and punishment contingencies, together with the individual'south current motivational state and controlling stimuli. Although behaviorists mostly accept the important office of heredity in determining behavior, they focus primarily on environmental events.

It combines elements of philosophy, methodology, and theory. Behaviorism emerged in the early 1900s every bit a reaction to depth psychology and other traditional forms of psychology, which frequently had difficulty making predictions that could exist tested experimentally, just derived from earlier inquiry in the late nineteenth century, such as when Edward Thorndike pioneered the law of effect, a process that involved the apply of consequences to strengthen or weaken behavior.

With a 1924 publication, John B. Watson devised methodological behaviorism, which rejected introspective methods and sought to understand beliefs by simply measuring observable behaviors and events. It was not until the 1930s that B. F. Skinner suggested that covert behavior—including noesis and emotions—is subject to the same controlling variables equally observable behavior, which became the basis for his philosophy called radical behaviorism.^[2] ^[iii] While Watson and Ivan Pavlov investigated how (conditioned) neutral stimuli arm-twist reflexes in respondent conditioning, Skinner assessed the reinforcement histories of the discriminative (antecedent) stimuli that emits behavior; the technique became known as operant conditioning.

The application of radical behaviorism—known as applied beliefs assay—is used in a variety of contexts, including, for case, applied animate being behavior and organizational beliefs direction to treatment of mental disorders, such as autism and substance abuse.^[4] ^[five] In addition, while behaviorism and cognitive schools of psychological idea do not concur theoretically, they accept complemented each other in the cerebral-behavior therapies, which have demonstrated utility in treating sure pathologies, including uncomplicated phobias, PTSD, and mood disorders.

Varieties [edit]

The titles given to the various branches of behaviorism include:

Behavioral genetics: Proposed in 1869 by Francis Galton, a relative of Charles Darwin.
Interbehaviorism: Proposed by Jacob Robert Kantor before B. F. Skinner's writings.
Methodological behaviorism: John B. Watson's behaviorism states that but public events (motor behaviors of an individual) tin be objectively observed. Although it was nonetheless best-selling that thoughts and feelings exist, they were not considered part of the science of behavior.^[two] ^[6] ^[7] Information technology also laid the theoretical foundation for the early on approach behavior modification in the 1970s and early 1980s.
Psychological behaviorism: As proposed by Arthur Due west. Staats, dissimilar the previous behaviorisms of Skinner, Hull, and Tolman, was based upon a plan of human inquiry involving various types of man beliefs. Psychological behaviorism introduces new principles of human learning. Humans learn not only by creature learning principles merely too by special human learning principles. Those principles involve humans' uniquely huge learning ability. Humans larn repertoires that enable them to learn other things. Human learning is thus cumulative. No other animal demonstrates that power, making the homo species unique.^[eight]
Radical behaviorism: Skinner's philosophy is an extension of Watson's course of behaviorism past theorizing that processes within the organism—particularly, individual events, such as thoughts and feelings—are also office of the scientific discipline of behavior, and suggests that environmental variables control these internal events simply as they control observable behaviors. Although individual events cannot be directly seen by others, they are afterwards determined through the species' overt behavior. Radical behaviorism forms the core philosophy behind behavior assay. Willard Van Orman Quine used many of radical behaviorism'southward ideas in his study of noesis and linguistic communication.^[6]
Teleological behaviorism: Proposed by Howard Rachlin, postal service-Skinnerian, purposive, close to microeconomics. Focuses on objective ascertainment every bit opposed to cognitive processes.
Theoretical behaviorism: Proposed by J. E. R. Staddon,^[nine] ^[ten] ^[xi] adds a concept of internal state to allow for the effects of context. According to theoretical behaviorism, a land is a fix of equivalent histories, i.eastward., past histories in which members of the same stimulus class produce members of the same response course (i.e., B. F. Skinner'due south concept of the operant). Conditioned stimuli are thus seen to control neither stimulus nor response but country. Theoretical behaviorism is a logical extension of Skinner's class-based (generic) definition of the operant.

Ii subtypes of theoretical behaviorism are:

Hullian and post-Hullian: theoretical, group data, not dynamic, physiological
Purposive: Tolman'south behavioristic anticipation of cerebral psychology

Modernistic-twenty-four hours theory: radical behaviorism [edit]

B. F. Skinner proposed radical behaviorism as the conceptual underpinning of the experimental analysis of behavior. This viewpoint differs from other approaches to behavioral research in various ways, simply, most notably hither, it contrasts with methodological behaviorism in accepting feelings, states of mind and introspection as behaviors as well subject to scientific investigation. Like methodological behaviorism, it rejects the reflex as a model of all behavior, and it defends the science of beliefs as complementary to but independent of physiology. Radical behaviorism overlaps considerably with other western philosophical positions, such as American pragmatism.^[12]

Although John B. Watson mainly emphasized his position of methodological behaviorism throughout his career, Watson and Rosalie Rayner conducted the renowned Little Albert experiment (1920), a study in which Ivan Pavlov'southward theory to respondent workout was first applied to eliciting a fearful reflex of crying in a human babe, and this became the launching point for understanding covert behavior (or private events) in radical behaviorism.^[13] However, Skinner felt that aversive stimuli should simply be experimented on with animals and spoke out against Watson for testing something and then controversial on a human.

In 1959, Skinner observed the emotions of two pigeons by noting that they appeared angry considering their feathers ruffled. The pigeons were placed together in an operant chamber, where they were ambitious as a consequence of previous reinforcement in the environment. Through stimulus control and subsequent bigotry training, whenever Skinner turned off the green light, the pigeons came to find that the food reinforcer is discontinued following each peck and responded without aggression. Skinner concluded that humans also learn aggression and possess such emotions (as well as other private events) no differently than do nonhuman animals.

Experimental and conceptual innovations [edit]

This essentially philosophical position gained strength from the success of Skinner's early experimental work with rats and pigeons, summarized in his books The Beliefs of Organisms ^[14] and Schedules of Reinforcement.^[15] Of particular importance was his concept of the operant response, of which the canonical instance was the rat's lever-press. In contrast with the idea of a physiological or reflex response, an operant is a class of structurally singled-out but functionally equivalent responses. For case, while a rat might press a lever with its left paw or its right hand or its tail, all of these responses operate on the world in the aforementioned style and have a common effect. Operants are often thought of every bit species of responses, where the individuals differ but the class coheres in its part-shared consequences with operants and reproductive success with species. This is a clear distinction between Skinner'southward theory and S–R theory.

Skinner's empirical work expanded on earlier research on trial-and-mistake learning by researchers such as Thorndike and Guthrie with both conceptual reformulations—Thorndike's notion of a stimulus-response "association" or "connection" was abandoned; and methodological ones—the use of the "free operant", so-called considering the animal was now permitted to respond at its ain charge per unit rather than in a series of trials determined by the experimenter procedures. With this method, Skinner carried out substantial experimental work on the effects of different schedules and rates of reinforcement on the rates of operant responses fabricated by rats and pigeons. He achieved remarkable success in training animals to perform unexpected responses, to emit big numbers of responses, and to demonstrate many empirical regularities at the purely behavioral level. This lent some brownie to his conceptual analysis. It is largely his conceptual assay that made his work much more than rigorous than his peers, a point which can be seen clearly in his seminal piece of work Are Theories of Learning Necessary? in which he criticizes what he viewed to be theoretical weaknesses then mutual in the report of psychology. An important descendant of the experimental analysis of beliefs is the Social club for Quantitative Analysis of Behavior.^[sixteen] ^[17]

Relation to language [edit]

As Skinner turned from experimental piece of work to concentrate on the philosophical underpinnings of a science of behavior, his attention turned to human language with his 1957 book Exact Behavior ^[18] and other language-related publications;^[xix] Verbal Beliefs laid out a vocabulary and theory for functional assay of verbal behavior, and was strongly criticized in a review by Noam Chomsky.^[20] ^[21]

Skinner did not respond in detail but claimed that Chomsky failed to empathise his ideas,^[22] and the disagreements betwixt the two and the theories involved accept been further discussed.^[23] ^[24] ^[25] ^[26] ^[27] ^[28] Innateness theory, which has been heavily critiqued,^[29] ^[30] is opposed to behaviorist theory which claims that language is a set up of habits that tin can be acquired by means of workout.^[31] ^[32] ^[33] According to some, the behaviorist account is a process which would be likewise tiresome to explicate a phenomenon every bit complicated as linguistic communication learning. What was important for a behaviorist'southward analysis of human behavior was not language acquisition so much as the interaction between language and overt beliefs. In an essay republished in his 1969 volume Contingencies of Reinforcement,^[19] Skinner took the view that humans could construct linguistic stimuli that would so acquire command over their beliefs in the same fashion that external stimuli could. The possibility of such "instructional command" over behavior meant that contingencies of reinforcement would not always produce the same effects on human beliefs as they reliably do in other animals. The focus of a radical behaviorist analysis of human behavior therefore shifted to an attempt to sympathize the interaction betwixt instructional control and contingency control, and also to understand the behavioral processes that determine what instructions are constructed and what control they larn over behavior. Recently, a new line of behavioral research on language was started under the name of relational frame theory.^[34] ^[35] ^[36] ^[37]

Instruction [edit]

Behaviourism focuses on ane particular view of learning: a alter in external behaviour achieved through using reinforcement and repetition (Rote learning) to shape behavior of learners. Skinner institute that behaviors could be shaped when the apply of reinforcement was implemented. Desired behavior is rewarded, while the undesired beliefs is not rewarded.^[38] Incorporating behaviorism into the classroom allowed educators to assist their students in excelling both academically and personally. In the field of language learning, this blazon of didactics was called the sound-lingual method, characterised by the whole form using choral chanting of fundamental phrases, dialogues and immediate correction.

Within the behaviourist view of learning, the "teacher" is the ascendant person in the classroom and takes complete control, evaluation of learning comes from the teacher who decides what is correct or wrong. The learner does not accept any opportunity for evaluation or reflection within the learning procedure, they are simply told what is right or wrong. The conceptualization of learning using this approach could exist considered "superficial," as the focus is on external changes in behaviour, i.e., not interested in the internal processes of learning leading to behaviour alter and has no place for the emotions involved in the procedure.

Operant workout [edit]

Operant conditioning was adult past B.F. Skinner in 1937 and deals with the management of environmental contingencies to change beliefs.^[fourteen] ^[39] ^[40] In other words, behavior is controlled by historical consequential contingencies, particularly reinforcement—a stimulus that increases the probability of performing behaviors, and penalty—a stimulus that decreases such probability. The core tools of consequences are either positive (presenting stimuli following a response), or negative (withdrawn stimuli following a response).^[41]

The following descriptions explains the concepts of four common types of consequences in operant conditioning:^[42]

Positive reinforcement: Providing a stimulus that an private enjoys, seeks, or craves, in lodge to reinforce desired behaviors.^[43] For case, when a person is teaching a dog to sit down, they pair the command "sit" with a treat. The care for is the positive reinforcement to the beliefs of sitting. The fundamental to making positive reinforcement effect is to reward the behavior immediately.
Negative reinforcement: Removing a stimulus that an individual does not desire to reinforce desired behaviors. For instance, a kid hates being nagged to clean his room. His female parent reinforces his room cleaning by removing the undesired stimulus of nagging after he has cleaned. Another example would be putting on sunscreen before going outside. The negative effect is getting a sunburn, so by putting on sunscreen, the behavior in this case, you avert the stimulus of getting a sunburn.^[44]
Positive punishment: Providing a stimulus that an individual does non desire to subtract undesired behaviors. An example of this would be spanking. If a child is doing something they have been warned not to practise, the parent might spank them. The undesired stimulus would be the spanking, and by adding this stimulus, the goal is to have that behavior avoided. The key to this technique is that even though the title says positive, the pregnant of positive here is "to add to." Then, in order to stop the behavior, the parent adds the adverse stimulus (spanking). The biggest problem with this type of grooming though is that the trainee doesn't usually learn the desired behavior, rather it teaches the trainee to avoid the punisher.^[45]
Negative penalisation: Removing a stimulus that an private desires in order to subtract undesired behaviors. An example of this would be grounding a child for failing a exam. Grounding in this example is taking away the child's ability to play video games. As long as it is clear that the ability to play video games was taken away considering they failed a test, this is negative penalty. The cardinal here is the connexion to the behavior and the upshot of the behavior.^[46]

Classical experiment in operant conditioning, for example, the Skinner Box, "puzzle box" or operant conditioning sleeping room to examination the furnishings of operant conditioning principles on rats, cats and other species. From the study of Skinner box, he discovered that the rats learned very effectively if they were rewarded frequently with nutrient. Skinner likewise plant that he could shape the rats' beliefs through the use of rewards, which could, in turn, be applied to human learning as well.

Skinner's model was based on the premise that reinforcement is used for the desired deportment or responses while punishment was used to stop the responses of the undesired actions that are non. This theory proved that humans or animals will repeat any action that leads to a positive issue, and avoiding whatsoever action that leads to a negative outcome. The experiment with the pigeons showed that a positive event leads to learned behavior since the pigeon learned to peck the disc in render for the reward of nutrient.

These historical consequential contingencies subsequently pb to (antecedent) stimulus control, but in dissimilarity to respondent conditioning where antecedent stimuli elicit reflexive behavior, operant behavior is only emitted and therefore does non force its occurrence. It includes the following controlling stimuli:^[42]

Discriminative stimulus (Sd): An antecedent stimulus that increases the chance of the organism engaging in a behavior. 1 example of this occurred in Skinner's laboratory. Whenever the green light (Sd) appeared, it signaled the pigeon to perform the behavior of pecking considering it learned in the past that each fourth dimension it pecked, food was presented (the positive reinforcing stimulus).
Stimulus delta (South-delta): An antecedent stimulus that signals the organism not to perform a behavior since it was extinguished or punished in the past. One notable instance of this occurs when a person stops their automobile immediately after the traffic lite turns red (South-delta). However, the person could decide to drive through the red light, but afterward receive a speeding ticket (the positive punishing stimulus), so this beliefs volition potentially not reoccur post-obit the presence of the Southward-delta.

Respondent workout [edit]

Although operant conditioning plays the largest role in discussions of behavioral mechanisms, respondent conditioning (also called Pavlovian or classical conditioning) is as well an important behavior-analytic procedure that needs not refer to mental or other internal processes. Pavlov'southward experiments with dogs provide the nigh familiar example of the classical workout procedure. In the beginning, the domestic dog was provided meat (unconditioned stimulus, UCS, naturally arm-twist a response that is non controlled) to eat, resulting in increased salivation (unconditioned response, UCR, which ways that a response is naturally caused past UCS). Subsequently, a bell ring was presented together with food to the dog. Although bell band was a neutral stimulus (NS, meaning that the stimulus did non take any effect), dog would start to salivate when but hearing a bell ring after a number of pairings. Eventually, the neutral stimulus (bell ring) became conditioned. Therefore, salivation was elicited as a conditioned response (the response same as the unconditioned response), pairing up with meat—the conditioned stimulus) ^[47] Although Pavlov proposed some tentative physiological processes that might be involved in classical workout, these accept not been confirmed.^[48] The idea of classical conditioning helped behaviorist John Watson notice the key mechanism behind how humans acquire the behaviors that they practise, which was to detect a natural reflex that produces the response beingness considered.

Watson's "Behaviourist Manifesto" has three aspects that deserve special recognition: 1 is that psychology should be purely objective, with any interpretation of conscious experience being removed, thus leading to psychology as the "science of behaviour"; the second one is that the goals of psychology should be to predict and control behaviour (as opposed to describe and explicate conscious mental states); the third one is that there is no notable stardom between human and non-human behaviour. Following Darwin's theory of evolution, this would simply mean that man behaviour is simply a more complex version in respect to behaviour displayed by other species.^[49]

In philosophy [edit]

Behaviorism is a psychological movement that can be contrasted with philosophy of mind.^[l] ^[51] ^[52] The basic premise of behaviorism is that the study of behavior should exist a natural science, such every bit chemistry or physics.^[53] ^[54] Initially behaviorism rejected any reference to hypothetical inner states of organisms equally causes for their behavior, but B.F. Skinner's radical behaviorism reintroduced reference to inner states and also advocated for the study of thoughts and feelings every bit behaviors subject to the aforementioned mechanisms equally external behavior.^[53] ^[54] Behaviorism takes a functional view of behavior. According to Edmund Fantino and colleagues: "Beliefs assay has much to offer the study of phenomena normally dominated by cognitive and social psychologists. We promise that successful application of behavioral theory and methodology volition non only shed low-cal on central problems in judgment and option but volition besides generate greater appreciation of the behavioral arroyo."^[55]

Behaviorist sentiments are not uncommon within philosophy of language and analytic philosophy. It is sometimes argued that Ludwig Wittgenstein dedicated a logical behaviorist position^[7] (e.m., the protrude in a box argument). In logical positivism (as held, e.g., past Rudolf Carnap^[7] and Carl Hempel),^[7] the meaning of psychological statements are their verification conditions, which consist of performed overt beliefs. W. Five. O. Quine made employ of a type of behaviorism,^[7] influenced by some of Skinner's ideas, in his own piece of work on linguistic communication. Quine's work in semantics differed substantially from the empiricist semantics of Carnap which he attempted to create an alternative to, couching his semantic theory in references to concrete objects rather than sensations. Gilbert Ryle defended a singled-out strain of philosophical behaviorism, sketched in his book The Concept of Mind.^[7] Ryle'south cardinal claim was that instances of dualism oftentimes represented "category mistakes", and hence that they were really misunderstandings of the utilise of ordinary language. Daniel Dennett besides acknowledges himself to be a type of behaviorist,^[56] though he offers extensive criticism of radical behaviorism and refutes Skinner's rejection of the value of intentional idioms and the possibility of costless will.^[57]

This is Dennett's master signal in "Skinner Skinned." Dennett argues that there is a crucial deviation between explaining and explaining away… If our caption of plainly rational behavior turns out to be extremely simple, we may want to say that the behavior was non really rational after all. Only if the explanation is very complex and intricate, we may desire to say non that the behavior is not rational, just that we now have a improve understanding of what rationality consists in. (Compare: if we find out how a computer program solves problems in linear algebra, we don't say it's non really solving them, nosotros just say nosotros know how information technology does information technology. On the other mitt, in cases like Weizenbaum's ELIZA program, the explanation of how the calculator carries on a chat is and so uncomplicated that the right affair to say seems to be that the machine isn't really carrying on a conversation, information technology's just a trick.)

—Curtis Brown, Philosophy of Mind, "Behaviorism: Skinner and Dennett"^[58]

Law of event and trace conditioning [edit]

Law of effect: Although Edward Thorndike's methodology mainly dealt with reinforcing observable behavior, it viewed cerebral antecedents as the causes of beliefs,^[59] and was theoretically much more similar to the cognitive-behavior therapies than classical (methodological) or modern-twenty-four hours (radical) behaviorism. Nevertheless, Skinner'due south operant conditioning was heavily influenced by the Law of Outcome's principle of reinforcement.^[59]
Trace conditioning: Akin to B.F. Skinner's radical behaviorism, it is a respondent conditioning technique based on Ivan Pavlov's concept of a "memory trace" in which the observer recalls the conditioned stimulus (CS), with the memory or remember beingness the unconditioned response (UR). There is too a time delay between the CS and unconditioned stimulus (US), causing the conditioned response (CR)—particularly the reflex—to be faded over time.^[59]

Molecular versus molar behaviorism [edit]

Skinner's view of behavior is about oftentimes characterized as a "molecular" view of behavior; that is, behavior can be decomposed into atomistic parts or molecules. This view is inconsistent with Skinner's consummate clarification of behavior as delineated in other works, including his 1981 article "Pick past Consequences".^[60] Skinner proposed that a complete account of behavior requires understanding of selection history at three levels: biological science (the natural selection or phylogeny of the animal); beliefs (the reinforcement history or ontogeny of the behavioral repertoire of the animal); and for some species, culture (the cultural practices of the social group to which the animal belongs). This whole organism and then interacts with its surround. Molecular behaviorists use notions from melioration theory, negative power function discounting or additive versions of negative ability office discounting.^[61]

Molar behaviorists, such as Howard Rachlin, Richard Herrnstein, and William Baum, contend that beliefs cannot be understood by focusing on events in the moment. That is, they argue that beliefs is all-time understood as the ultimate product of an organism'due south history and that molecular behaviorists are committing a fallacy by inventing fictitious proximal causes for behavior. Molar behaviorists fence that standard molecular constructs, such equally "associative force", are ameliorate replaced past molar variables such as rate of reinforcement.^[62] Thus, a molar behaviorist would describe "loving someone" as a pattern of loving beliefs over time; in that location is no isolated, proximal cause of loving behavior, but a history of behaviors (of which the current beliefs might be an example) that can be summarized as "beloved".

Theoretical behaviorism [edit]

Skinner'southward radical behaviorism has been highly successful experimentally, revealing new phenomena with new methods, but Skinner's dismissal of theory limited its evolution. Theoretical behaviorism^[9] recognized that a historical system, an organism, has a state equally well every bit sensitivity to stimuli and the ability to emit responses. Indeed, Skinner himself acknowledged the possibility of what he chosen "latent" responses in humans, even though he neglected to extend this idea to rats and pigeons.^[63] Latent responses plant a repertoire, from which operant reinforcement can select. Theoretical behaviorism links between the brain and the behavior that provides a real understanding of the behavior. Rather than a mental presumption of how brain-behavior relates.^[64]

Beliefs assay and civilization [edit]

Cultural analysis has e'er been at the philosophical cadre of radical behaviorism from the early days (as seen in Skinner's Walden Two, Scientific discipline & Human Behavior, Across Freedom & Dignity, and About Behaviorism).

During the 1980s, behavior analysts, nigh notably Sigrid Glenn, had a productive interchange with cultural anthropologist Marvin Harris (the about notable proponent of "cultural materialism") regarding interdisciplinary work. Very recently, beliefs analysts have produced a set of basic exploratory experiments in an effort toward this end.^[65] Behaviorism is too frequently used in game development, although this application is controversial.^[66]

Behavior computer science and behavior computing [edit]

With the fast growth of big behavioral information and applications, beliefs analysis is ubiquitous. Agreement beliefs from the computer science and calculating perspective becomes increasingly disquisitional for in-depth understanding of what, why and how behaviors are formed, interact, evolve, change and bear on business and decision. Behavior informatics^[67] ^[68] and behavior computing^[69] ^[lxx] deeply explore beliefs intelligence and behavior insights from the informatics and calculating perspectives.

Criticisms and limitations [edit]

In the second one-half of the 20th century, behaviorism was largely eclipsed as a result of the cognitive revolution.^[71] ^[72] This shift was due to radical behaviorism being highly criticized for non examining mental processes, and this led to the development of the cerebral therapy motion. In the mid-20th century, three principal influences arose that would inspire and shape cognitive psychology as a formal school of idea:

Noam Chomsky's 1959 critique of behaviorism, and empiricism more mostly, initiated what would come to be known as the "cognitive revolution".^[73]
Developments in computer scientific discipline would atomic number 82 to parallels being drawn betwixt human idea and the computational functionality of computers, opening entirely new areas of psychological thought. Allen Newell and Herbert Simon spent years developing the concept of bogus intelligence (AI) and later worked with cognitive psychologists regarding the implications of AI. The effective effect was more of a framework conceptualization of mental functions with their counterparts in computers (memory, storage, retrieval, etc.)
Formal recognition of the field involved the establishment of research institutions such as George Mandler's Center for Man Data Processing in 1964. Mandler described the origins of cognitive psychology in a 2002 article in the Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences ^[74]

In the early years of cognitive psychology, behaviorist critics held that the empiricism information technology pursued was incompatible with the concept of internal mental states. Cerebral neuroscience, however, continues to get together testify of directly correlations betwixt physiological encephalon action and putative mental states, endorsing the basis for cognitive psychology.

Behavior therapy [edit]

Beliefs therapy is a term referring to different types of therapies that treat mental health disorders. It identifies and helps alter people's unhealthy behaviors or destructive behaviors through learning theory and conditioning. Ivan Pavlov's classical conditioning, equally well as counterconditioning are the basis for much of clinical behavior therapy, but also includes other techniques, including operant conditioning, or contingency management, and modeling—sometimes called observational learning. A frequently noted behavior therapy is systematic desensitization, which was start demonstrated by Joseph Wolpe and Arnold Lazarus.^[75]

21st-century behaviorism (behavior analysis) [edit]

Applied behavior analysis (ABA)—besides called behavioral technology—is a scientific discipline that applies the principles of behavior assay to change behavior. ABA derived from much before research in the Periodical of the Experimental Analysis of Beliefs, which was founded by B.F. Skinner and his colleagues at Harvard University. Most a decade subsequently the report "The psychiatric nurse as a behavioral engineer" (1959) was published in that periodical, which demonstrated how effective the token economy was in reinforcing more adaptive behavior for hospitalized patients with schizophrenia and intellectual disability, it led to researchers at the University of Kansas to get-go the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis in 1968.

Although ABA and beliefs modification are similar behavior-alter technologies in that the learning surroundings is modified through respondent and operant conditioning, behavior modification did not initially accost the causes of the beliefs (peculiarly, the ecology stimuli that occurred in the past), or investigate solutions that would otherwise prevent the behavior from reoccurring. As the evolution of ABA began to unfold in the mid-1980s, functional beliefs assessments (FBAs) were developed to clarify the part of that behavior, so that it is accurately determined which differential reinforcement contingencies volition be nearly effective and less probable for aversive consequences to exist administered.^[13] ^[76] ^[77] In addition, methodological behaviorism was the theory underpinning behavior modification since individual events were not conceptualized during the 1970s and early on 1980s, which contrasted from the radical behaviorism of behavior analysis. ABA—the term that replaced beliefs modification—has emerged into a thriving field.^[13] ^[78]

The independent development of behaviour analysis outside the United States also continues to develop.^[79] ^[80] ^[81] ^[82] ^[83] ^[84] In the US, the American Psychological Association (APA) features a subdivision for Beliefs Analysis, titled APA Sectionalization 25: Behavior Assay, which has been in existence since 1964, and the interests among behavior analysts today are broad-ranging, equally indicated in a review of the 30 Special Involvement Groups (SIGs) within the Clan for Beliefs Assay International (ABAI). Such interests include everything from animal behavior and environmental conservation, to classroom instruction (such as direct instruction and precision educational activity), exact behavior, developmental disabilities and autism, clinical psychology (i.due east., forensic behavior analysis), behavioral medicine (i.e., behavioral gerontology, AIDS prevention, and fitness preparation), and consumer beliefs analysis.

The field of applied animal beliefs—a sub-subject field of ABA that involves grooming animals—is regulated by the Creature Beliefs Social club, and those who exercise this technique are called applied animal behaviorists. Research on practical animal behavior has been frequently conducted in the Practical Animal Behaviour Science journal since its founding in 1974.

ABA has also been particularly well-established in the surface area of developmental disabilities since the 1960s, but it was not until the tardily 1980s that individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders were beginning to grow so rapidly and groundbreaking enquiry was existence published that parent advancement groups started enervating for services throughout the 1990s, which encouraged the germination of the Behavior Annotator Certification Board, a credentialing program that certifies professionally trained behavior analysts on the national level to deliver such services. All the same, the certification is applicative to all human being services related to the rather broad field of behavior analysis (other than the treatment for autism), and the ABAI currently has fourteen accredited MA and Ph.D programs for comprehensive study in that field.

Early behavioral interventions (EBIs) based on ABA are empirically validated for educational activity children with autism and has been proven as such for over the past five decades. Since the late 1990s and throughout the twenty-start century, early ABA interventions accept also been identified as the treatment of choice by the US Surgeon General, American University of Pediatrics, and Us National Research Quango.

Discrete trial grooming—also called early intensive behavioral intervention—is the traditional EBI technique implemented for xxx to forty hours per week that instructs a child to sit down in a chair, imitate fine and gross motor behaviors, as well as learn eye contact and speech, which are taught through shaping, modeling, and prompting, with such prompting beingness phased out as the kid begins mastering each skill. When the child becomes more than exact from detached trials, the table-based instructions are later discontinued, and another EBI procedure known as incidental educational activity is introduced in the natural environment by having the child enquire for desired items kept out of their direct access, as well every bit allowing the child to choose the play activities that volition motivate them to engage with their facilitators before didactics the child how to interact with other children their own historic period.

A related term for incidental pedagogy, called pivotal response treatment (PRT), refers to EBI procedures that exclusively entail twenty-v hours per week of naturalistic teaching (without initially using discrete trials). Current inquiry is showing that the bulk of the population learn more words at a quicker stride through PRT since only a small portion of the non-exact autistic population accept lower receptive language skills—a phrase used to describe individuals who practice not pay much attention to overt stimuli or others in their environment—and the latter are the children who initially require discrete trials to acquire oral communication.

Organizational behavior management, which applies contingency management procedures to model and reinforce appropriate work behavior for employees in organizations, has adult a especially potent following within ABA, as evidenced by the formation of the OBM Network and Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, which was rated the third-highest impact journal in applied psychology by ISI JOBM rating.

Modern-day clinical behavior analysis has too witnessed a massive resurgence in research, with the development of relational frame theory (RFT), which is described as an extension of verbal behavior and a "mail-Skinnerian account of linguistic communication and cognition."^[85] ^[34] ^[35] ^[36] RFT also forms the empirical basis for acceptance and delivery therapy, a therapeutic approach to counseling often used to manage such conditions as anxiety and obesity that consists of acceptance and commitment, value-based living, cognitive defusion, counterconditioning (mindfulness), and contingency management (positive reinforcement).^[86] ^[87] ^[88] ^[89] ^[90] ^[91] Some other evidence-based counseling technique derived from RFT is the functional analytic psychotherapy known equally behavioral activation that relies on the ACL model—sensation, backbone, and honey—to reinforce more positive moods for those struggling with low.

Incentive-based contingency management (CM) is the standard of care for adults with substance-use disorders; information technology has also been shown to exist highly effective for other addictions (i.due east., obesity and gambling). Although it does not directly accost the underlying causes of behavior, incentive-based CM is highly behavior analytic as it targets the function of the client's motivational behavior by relying on a preference assessment, which is an assessment process that allows the private to select the preferred reinforcer (in this case, the budgetary value of the voucher, or the employ of other incentives, such as prizes). Another evidence-based CM intervention for substance corruption is customs reinforcement approach and family training that uses FBAs and counterconditioning techniques—such equally behavioral skills training and relapse prevention—to model and reinforce healthier lifestyle choices which promote self-management of abstinence from drugs, alcohol, or cigarette smoking during high-risk exposure when engaging with family unit members, friends, and co-workers.

While schoolwide positive behavior support consists of conducting assessments and a task analysis program to differentially reinforce curricular supports that replace students' confusing behavior in the classroom, pediatric feeding therapy incorporates a liquid chaser and mentum feeder to shape proper eating behavior for children with feeding disorders. Habit reversal preparation, an arroyo firmly grounded in counterconditioning which uses contingency direction procedures to reinforce alternative behavior, is currently the but empirically validated arroyo for managing tic disorders.

Some studies on exposure (desensitization) therapies—which refer to an array of interventions based on the respondent workout procedure known as habituation and typically infuses counterconditioning procedures, such as meditation and breathing exercises—have recently been published in behavior analytic journals since the 1990s, every bit most other research are conducted from a cognitive-behavior therapy framework. When based on a behavior analytic research standpoint, FBAs are implemented to precisely outline how to utilize the flooding form of desensitization (likewise called straight exposure therapy) for those who are unsuccessful in overcoming their specific phobia through systematic desensitization (besides known as graduated exposure therapy). These studies as well reveal that systematic desensitization is more effective for children if used in conjunction with shaping, which is farther termed contact desensitization, but this comparison has however to exist substantiated with adults.

Other widely published behavior analytic journals include Behavior Modification, The Beliefs Analyst, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, The Assay of Verbal Behavior, Behavior and Philosophy, Beliefs and Social Problems, and The Psychological Tape.

Cognitive-behavior therapy [edit]

Cerebral-behavior therapy (CBT) is a beliefs therapy discipline that frequently overlaps considerably with the clinical behavior analysis subfield of ABA, simply differs in that it initially incorporates cognitive restructuring and emotional regulation to alter a person's cognition and emotions.

A popularly noted counseling intervention known as dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) includes the apply of a chain analysis, as well as cerebral restructuring, emotional regulation, distress tolerance, counterconditioning (mindfulness), and contingency management (positive reinforcement). DBT is quite similar to credence and commitment therapy, merely contrasts in that it derives from a CBT framework. Although DBT is most widely researched for and empirically validated to reduce the risk of suicide in psychiatric patients with borderline personality disorder, it can often be applied effectively to other mental health conditions, such as substance abuse, as well as mood and eating disorders.

Almost research on exposure therapies (also chosen desensitization)—ranging from centre movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy to exposure and response prevention—are conducted through a CBT framework in non-behavior analytic journals, and these enhanced exposure therapies are well-established in the research literature for treating phobic, mail-traumatic stress, and other anxiety disorders (such every bit obsessive-compulsive disorder, or OCD).

Cognitive-based behavioral activation (BA)—the psychotherapeutic approach used for depression—is shown to be highly effective and is widely used in clinical do. Some large randomized control trials accept indicated that cognitive-based BA is equally beneficial as antidepressant medications only more efficacious than traditional cognitive therapy. Other ordinarily used clinical treatments derived from behavioral learning principles that are oftentimes implemented through a CBT model include community reinforcement approach and family training, and habit reversal training for substance abuse and tics, respectively.

[edit]

Acceptance and commitment therapy
Applied animal behavior
Behavioral activation
Behavior modification
Behavior therapy
Biofeedback
Clinical behavior assay
Contingency management
Desensitization
Dialectical behavior therapy
Direct education
Discrete trial preparation
Exposure and response prevention
Exposure therapy
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
Flooding (psychology)
Functional analytic psychotherapy
Habit reversal training
Organizational behavior management
Pivotal response treatment
Positive beliefs support
Prolonged exposure therapy
Social skills training
Systematic desensitization

List of notable behaviorists [edit]

Nathan Azrin
Don Baer
Albert Bandura
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Vladimir Bekhterev
Sidney W. Bijou
Charles Ferster
Jacque Fresco
Doreen Granpeesheh
Edwin Ray Guthrie
Betty Hart
Steven C. Hayes
Richard J. Herrnstein
Clark L. Hull
Matthew Israel
Brian Iwata
Alan Due east. Kazdin
Fred Southward. Keller
Robert Koegel
Jon Levy
Marsha M. Linehan
Ole Ivar Lovaas
F. Charles Mace
Jack Michael
Neal East. Miller
O. Hobart Mowrer
Charles E. Osgood
Ivan Pavlov
Murray Sidman
B. F. Skinner
Kenneth W. Spence
J. E. R. Staddon
Edward Thorndike
Edward C. Tolman
John B. Watson
Montrose Wolf
Hans Eysenck
Joseph Wolpe

See besides [edit]

Behavior analysis of child evolution
Behavioral modify theories
Behavioral economics
Behavioral neuroscience
Cerebral inhibition
Dog behaviorist
Ethology
Functionalism (philosophy of listen)
List of publications in psychology § Behaviorism
Models of abnormality § Behavioural model
Operationalization
Pharmacology § Behavioral pharmacology
Perceptual control theory
Professional practice of behavior analysis

References [edit]

^ Araiba, Sho (June 2019). "Current diversification of behaviorism". Perspectives on Behavior Science. 43 (ane): 157–175. doi:x.1007/s40614-019-00207-0. PMC7198672. PMID 32440649.
^ ^a ^b Chiesa, Mecca (1994). Radical Behaviorism: The Philosophy and the Science. Authors Cooperative, Inc. pp. 1–241. ISBN978-0962331145. Archived from the original on four September 2017. Retrieved 31 July 2016.
^ Dillenburger, Karola & Keenan, Mickey (2009). "None of the Every bit in ABA represent autism: Dispelling the myths". Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability. 34 (2): 193–195. doi:10.1080/13668250902845244. PMID 19404840. S2CID 1818966.
^ Baer, Donald Chiliad.; Wolf, Montrose M.; Risley, Todd R. (1968). "Some electric current dimensions of applied beliefs analysis". Periodical of Applied Beliefs Analysis. 1 (1): 91–7. doi:ten.1901/jaba.1968.ane-91. PMC1310980. PMID 16795165.
^ Madden, Gregory, ed. (2013). APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis. APA Handbooks in Psychology Series; APA Reference Books Drove. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN978-i-4338-1111-1. OCLC 771425225. Retrieved 24 December 2014.
^ ^a ^b Skinner, BF (1976). Near Behaviorism. New York: Random House, Inc. p. 18. ISBN978-0-394-71618-3.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Zalta, Edward North. (ed.). "Behaviorism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
^ Muckler, Frederick A. (June 1963). "On the Reason of Animals: Historical Antecedents to the Logic of Mod Behaviorism". Psychological Reports. 12 (3): 863–882. doi:10.2466/pr0.1963.12.three.863. ISSN 0033-2941. S2CID 144398380.
^ ^a ^b Staddon, John (2014) The New Behaviorism (2d edition). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
^ Staddon, John (2016) The Englishman: Memoirs of a psychobiologist. Academy of Buckingham Press.
^ Malone, John C. (July 2004). "Modern molar behaviorism and theoretical behaviorism: religion and scientific discipline". Journal of the Experimental Assay of Behavior. 82 (ane): 95–102. doi:10.1901/jeab.2004.82-95. PMC1284997.
^ Moxley, R.A. (2004). "Pragmatic selectionism: The philosophy of behavior analysis" (PDF). The Behavior Annotator Today. five (1): 108–25. doi:10.1037/h0100137. Retrieved 10 Jan 2008.
^ ^a ^b ^c Mace, F. Charles; Critchfield, Thomas S. (May 2010). "Translational enquiry in beliefs assay: Historic traditions and imperative for the time to come". Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Beliefs. 93 (3): 293–312. doi:ten.1901/jeab.2010.93-293. PMC2861871. PMID 21119847.
^ ^a ^b Skinner, B.F. (1938). The Beliefs of Organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. p. 473. ISBN978-0-87411-487-iv.
^ Cheney, Carl D.; Ferster, Charles B. (1997). Schedules of Reinforcement (B.F. Skinner Reprint Series). Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group. p. 758. ISBN978-0-87411-828-5.
^ Commons, Yard.L. (2001). "A brusk history of the Society for the Quantitative Analysis of Beliefs" (PDF). Beliefs Analyst Today. 2 (3): 275–nine. doi:10.1037/h0099944. Retrieved ten Jan 2008.
^ Thornbury, Scott (1998). "The Lexical Approach: A journey without maps". Modern English language Instructor. 7 (4): 7–13.
^ Skinner, Burrhus Frederick (1957). Verbal Beliefs. Acton, Massachusetts: Copley Publishing Group. ISBN978-i-58390-021-5.
^ ^a ^b Skinner, B. F. (1969). "An operant analysis of problem-solving". Contingencies of reinforcement: a theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall. pp. 133–157. ISBN978-0-13-171728-2. OCLC 12726275.
^ Chomsky, Noam; Skinner, B.F. (1959). "A Review of B.F. Skinner'southward Verbal Behavior". Linguistic communication. 35 (1): 26–58. doi:10.2307/411334. JSTOR 411334. Archived from the original on 29 September 2015. Retrieved ix May 2008.
^ Kennison, Shelia K. (2013). Introduction to linguistic communication development. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. ISBN9781483315324.
^ Skinner, B.F. (1972). "I Have Been Misunderstood". Center Magazine (March–April): 63.
^ MacCorquodale, Yard. (1970). "On Chomsky'due south Review of Skinner's VERBAL BEHAVIOR". Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Beliefs. 13 (one): 83–99. doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-83. PMC1333660. Archived from the original on vi Jan 2009. Retrieved ten Jan 2008.
^ Stemmer, N. (1990). "Skinner's exact behavior, Chomsky's review, and mentalism". J Exp Anal Behav. 54 (three): 307–15. doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.54-307. PMC1323000. PMID 2103585.
^ Palmer, David C (2006). "On Chomsky's Appraisal of Skinner'south Verbal Beliefs: A Half Century of Misunderstanding". The Behavior Analyst. 29 (2): 253–267. doi:x.1007/BF03392134. ISSN 0738-6729. PMC2223153. PMID 22478467.
^ Palmer, David C. (2000). "Chomsky's nativism: A critical review". The Analysis of Exact Beliefs. 17: 39–50. doi:x.1007/BF03392954. ISSN 0889-9401. PMC2755455. PMID 22477212.
^ Virués-Ortega, Javier (2006). "The Case Against B. F. Skinner 45 years Later: An Run into with N. Chomsky". The Behavior Analyst. 29 (2): 243–251. doi:10.1007/BF03392133. ISSN 0738-6729. PMC2223151. PMID 22478466.
^ Adelman, Barry Eshkol (December 2007). "An Underdiscussed Aspect of Chomsky (1959)". The Assay of Verbal Behavior. 23 (ane): 29–34. doi:10.1007/BF03393044. ISSN 0889-9401. PMC2774611. PMID 22477378.
^ Chater, Nick; Christiansen, Morten H. (Oct 2008). "Language every bit shaped by the brain". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 31 (v): 489–509. CiteSeerXten.one.1.379.3136. doi:10.1017/S0140525X08004998. ISSN 1469-1825. PMID 18826669.
^ Levinson, Stephen C.; Evans, Nicholas (October 2009). "The myth of linguistic communication universals: Language diversity and its importance for cerebral science". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32 (5): 429–448. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999094X. ISSN 1469-1825. PMID 19857320.
^ Thornbury, Scott (2006). An A-Z of ELT. Oxford: Macmillan. p. 24. ISBN978-1405070638.
^ Douglas Chocolate-brown, H (2000). Principles of Linguistic communication Learning and Teaching (4th ed.). White Plains: Longman/Pearson Didactics. pp. 8–9. ISBN978-0-13-017816-9.
^ Nicoladis, Elena; Sturdy, Christopher B. (2017). "How Much of Language Acquisition Does Operant Conditioning Explain?". Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 1918. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01918. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC5671510. PMID 29163295.
^ ^a ^b Blackledge, J. T. (2003). An introduction to relational frame theory: Basics and applications. The Beliefs Analyst Today, 3(4), 421-433.[i]
^ ^a ^b Dymond, Simon; May, Richard J; Munnelly, Anita; Hoon, Alice E (2010). "Evaluating the Evidence Base for Relational Frame Theory: A Citation Analysis". The Beliefs Analyst. 33 (1): 97–117. doi:10.1007/BF03392206. ISSN 0738-6729. PMC2867509. PMID 22479129.
^ ^a ^b Rehfeldt, Ruth Anne (2011). "Toward a Applied science of Derived Stimulus Relations: An Analysis of Manufactures Published in the Periodical of Applied Beliefs Assay, 1992–2009". Journal of Practical Beliefs Analysis. 44 (1): 109–119. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109. ISSN 0021-8855. PMC3050465. PMID 21541138.
^ Martin O'Connor, Lynn Farrell, Anita Munnelly, Louise McHugh. (2017). Citation assay of relational frame theory: 2009–2016. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Scientific discipline, Volume 6, Event ii, Pages 152-158.[2]
^ "Behaviorism - Learning Theories". Learning Theories. 31 January 2007. Retrieved 4 Baronial 2017.
^ W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), 1977, Handbook of operant beliefs. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
^ Staddon, J. E. R. (2016) Adaptive Behavior and Learning, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
^ "Classical and Operant Conditioning - Behaviorist Theories". Learning Theories. xix June 2015. Retrieved 4 August 2017.
^ ^a ^b Cooper, John O.; Heron, Timothy E.; Heward, William Fifty. (12 September 2019). Practical Beliefs Analysis (three ed.). Pearson. pp. 1–1056. ISBN9781292324630.
^ Risk, Paul (2014). Learning and Behavior. Belmont, CA: Jon-David Hague. p. 133. ISBN978-i-111-83277-3.
^ "Examples of Negative Reinforcement". examples.yourdictionary.com . Retrieved 21 March 2021.
^ Pryor, Karen (2019). Don't shoot the domestic dog! : the fine art of teaching and training. Simon & Schuster. ISBN978-ane-9821-0646-one. OCLC 1132296613.
^ Li, Author Pamela (14 January 2020). "What is Negative Penalisation (Examples and Effectiveness)". Parenting For Encephalon . Retrieved 21 March 2021.
^ "Ivan Pavlov". Retrieved xvi April 2012.
^ Bitterman, M. E. (2006). "Classical conditioning since Pavlov". Review of General Psychology. SAGE Publications. ten (4): 365–376. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.365. ISSN 1089-2680. S2CID 144362212.
^ Richard Gross, Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour
^ Schlinger, Henry D. (one July 2009). "Theory of Heed: An Overview and Behavioral Perspective". The Psychological Record. 59 (iii): 435–448. doi:10.1007/BF03395673. ISSN 2163-3452. S2CID 145671713.
^ Moore, J. (2013). Mentalism as a Radical Behaviorist Views Information technology — Function i. The Periodical of Mind and Behavior. Vol. 34, No. two, pp. 133-164.[iii]
^ Moore, J. (2013). Mentalism as a Radical Behaviorist Views It — Part ii. The Journal of Mind and Behavior. Vol. 34, No. 3/iv, pp. 205-232.[4]
^ ^a ^b Catania, A. C. (2013). A natural science of behavior. Review of General Psychology, 17(two), 133-139.[v]
^ ^a ^b Jackson, Yard. (2009). The natural pick: behavior analysis as a natural science. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, ten:2, 103-118.[6]
^ Fantino, Due east.; Stolarz-Fantino, Due south.; Navarro, A. (2003). "Logical fallacies: A behavioral approach to reasoning". The Behavior Analyst Today. 4. p.116 (pp.109–117). doi:ten.1037/h0100014.
^ Dennett, D.C. "The Bulletin is: At that place is no Medium". Tufts University. Archived from the original on 11 January 2008. Retrieved 10 January 2008.
^ Dennett, Daniel (1981). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Bradford Books. MIT Press. p. 53. ISBN978-0-262-54037-seven. LCCN 78013723.
^ Brownish, Curtis (2001). "Behaviorism: Skinner and Dennett". Philosophy of Heed. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University.
^ ^a ^b ^c Due west. David Pierce; Carl D. Cheney (2017). Behavior assay and learning: a biobehavioral approach (sixth ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 1–622. ISBN978-1138898585.
^ Skinner, B.F (31 July 1981). "Pick past Consequences" (PDF). Science. 213 (4507): 501–4. Bibcode:1981Sci...213..501S. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.7244649. PMID 7244649. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2010. Retrieved 14 August 2010.
^ Fantino, Eastward. (2000). "Delay-reduction theory—the case for temporal context: comment on Grace and Savastano (2000)". J Exp Psychol Gen. 129 (4): 444–six. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.444. PMID 11142857.
^ Baum, West.M. (2003). "The molar view of beliefs and its usefulness in beliefs assay". Behavior Annotator Today. four: 78–81. doi:10.1037/h0100009. Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 10 Jan 2008.
^ Staddon, J. Theoretical behaviorism. Philosophy and Behavior. (45) in press.
^ Roback, A. A. (1937). Behaviorism at twenty-five. Sci-Art Publishers. OCLC 881361266.
^ Ward, Todd A.; Eastman, Raymond; Ninness, Chris (2009). "An Experimental Analysis of Cultural Materialism: The Effects of Various Modes of Production on Resource Sharing". Beliefs and Social Problems. eighteen: i–23. doi:ten.5210/bsi.v18i1.1950. S2CID 153865620.
^ Jon Radoff (2011). "Gamification, Behaviorism and Bullsh$!". Radoff.com. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011. Retrieved eleven August 2011.
^ Cao, Longbing (2010). "In-depth Behavior Understanding and Use: the Behavior Computer science Approach". Information Science. 180 (17): 3067–3085. arXiv:2007.15516. doi:ten.1016/j.ins.2010.03.025. S2CID 7400761.
^ Cao, Longbing; Joachims, Thorsten; et al. (2014). "Behavior Information science: A New Perspective". IEEE Intelligent Systems. 29 (4): 62–80. doi:10.1109/mis.2014.60. S2CID 18926761.
^ Cao, Longbing; Yu, Philip, eds. (2012). Behavior Calculating: Modeling, Analysis, Mining and Decision. Springer. ISBN978-i-4471-2969-1.
^ Cao, Longbing; Motoda, Hiroshi (2013). Beliefs and Social Computing. Springer. ISBN978-3-319-04047-ix.
^ Friesen, North. (2005). Mind and Machine: Ethical and Epistemological Implications for Research. Thompson Rivers University, B.C., Canada.
^ Waldrop, One thousand.M. (2002). The Dream Machine: JCR Licklider and the revolution that made calculating personal. New York: Penguin Books. (pp. 139–xl).
^ Chomsky, N (1959). "Review of Skinner'southward Exact Behavior". Language. 35 (1): 26–58. doi:x.2307/411334. JSTOR 411334. Chomsky Northward. Preface to the reprint of A Review of Skinner'due south Verbal Behavior. In: Jakobovits L.A, Miron Thou.Due south, editors. Readings in the psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1967.
^ Mandler, George (2002). "Origins of the cognitive (r)evolution". Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 38 (4): 339–353. doi:10.1002/jhbs.10066. PMID 12404267.
^ Wolpe, Joseph (1968) [1966]. Behavior therapy techniques: a guide to the treatment of neuroses. Pergamon Press. OCLC 6051117.
^ Mace, F. Charles (1994). "The significance and hereafter of functional analysis methodologies". Periodical of Practical Beliefs Analysis. 27 (2): 385–392. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-385. PMC1297814. PMID 16795830.
^ Pelios, 50.; Morren, J.; Tesch, D.; Axelrod, S. (1999). "The touch on of functional assay methodology on handling option for self-injurious and ambitious behavior". Periodical of Applied Behavior Assay. 32 (2): 185–95. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-185. PMC1284177. PMID 10396771.
^ Slocum, Timothy A.; Detrich, Ronnie; Wilczynski, Susan G.; Spencer, Trina D.; Lewis, Teri (May 2014). "The evidence-based practice of applied behavior assay". The Behavior Annotator. 37 (1): 41–56. doi:10.1007/s40614-014-0005-2. PMC4883454. PMID 27274958.
^ Kellaway, Lucy (7 January 2015). "My team gets more excited past loo curlicue than business budgets: Work issues answered". Financial Times. London. p. x. Retrieved 22 November 2015.
^ Eyres, Harry (nineteen Dec 2009). "Peaks in a trough twelvemonth: The Boring Lane". Financial Times. p. 22. Retrieved 22 November 2015.
^ Stern, Stefan (5 August 2008). "Go along up motivation levels through long summer days". Fiscal Times. London. p. 12. Archived from the original on 22 November 2015. Retrieved 22 November 2015.
^ Skapinker, Michael (xi December 2002). "Human capitalism: Does treating workers well help business too? A PwC study provides some show". Financial Times. London. p. 22.
^ Skapinker, Michael (9 April 2013). "The 50 ideas that shaped concern today". Financial Times. London. Retrieved 22 November 2015.
^ "Reinventing the deal; American capitalism". The Economist. Vol. 417, no. 8961. London. 24 October 2015. pp. 21–24.
^ Hayes, S.C.; Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B. (2001) Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian account of human language and knowledge. Kluwer Academic: New York.
^ Corrigan, P. Due west. (2001). Getting ahead of the data: A Threat to some behavior therapies. The Beliefs Therapist, 24(9), 189-193.[7]
^ Hayes, South. C. (2002). On being visited by the vita constabulary: A reply to Corrigan. The Beliefs Therapist, 25, 134-137.[eight]
^ Corrigan, P. (2002). The data is still the affair: A reply to Gaynor and Hayes. The Beliefs Therapist, 25, 140.[9]
^ Powers, G.B., Vörding, Chiliad. & Emmelkamp, P.M.Grand. (2009). Acceptance and commitment therapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 8, 73-fourscore.
^ Levin, M., & Hayes, S.C. (2009). Is Acceptance and delivery therapy superior to established handling comparisons? Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 78, 380.
^ Powers, M. B., & Emmelkamp, P. Grand. G. (2009). Response to 'Is acceptance and commitment therapy superior to established treatment comparisons?' Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 78, 380–381.

External links [edit]

Wait upwards behaviorism in Wiktionary, the free lexicon.

Graham, George. "Behaviorism". In Zalta, Edward North. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
"Behaviorism". Cyberspace Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorism

Posted by: tawneytobt1981.blogspot.com